Last Wednesday, I wrote about the press conference of Gloria Arroyo with the Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines that Malacañang press office was working out. It was supposed to have been yesterday.
Malacañang informed Focap that Arroyo would not answer political questions. She would only answer questions “pertaining to the economy and how the current US financial crisis is affecting the Philippines and other Asian countries,” Press Undersecretary Martin Crisostomo said.
Focap did not agree to the restrictions. Malacañang postponed the presscon giving as an excuse Press Secretary Jesus Dureza “not feeling well.” But Dureza was well enough to moderate yesterday’s presscon of the economic managers with the very cooperative Malacañang press corps.
In a letter to Dureza, Focap president Jason Gutierrez wished him “speedy recovery”. He also asked the press secretary to reconsider the conditions they set and “ allow a free-flowing interaction with FOCAP members without any restrictions on the subject matters to be covered.”
Citing the history of Focap which was founded under martial law, Gutierrez conveyed the members’ objection “to being party to any form of media management, prior restraint or censorship.”
“Fencing off certain subjects for discussion with the president does not bode well for press freedom,” he said.
A number of commentors in my blog said since Arroyo wants only questions on the economy, they would like Focap members to ask their “economic questions”.
From Sulbatz:
1. What economic benefits did the Filipino people derive from the “Hello Garci” scandal?
2. Does the Joc-Joc Bolante fertilizer scam have anything to do with the rice shortage that plunged the country into dire economic straits?
3. Does EO 464 and the invocation of executive privilege on questions regarding corruption and shady ecnomomic deals increase investor confidence?
4.How will travel junkets by a party of more or less 70, paid for by taxpayers, be economically beneficial to the country? And how would it not drain the coffers more?
5.Madam President, we agree that peace ushers in economic progress. What were the effects of this treasonous deal with the MILF under the MOA-AD which, by the way, you profess to have not read, on the economy?
6.We are not economists, Madam President, but we are baffled by how the law of supply and Demand does not apply to you. It appears that the more you supply the nation with corruption, the more there is a demand for you to resign. Shouldn’t it be inversely proportional? How do you explain that?
Atty 36252 wants to know if there were any investments by the GSIS and SSS in the US markets? If any, how much each? He also wants a copy of the economic analysis of the NEDA?
Other questions on the economy by Atty 36252:
1..What is the projected economic benefit of the mining deal of Mike Defensor? How much government revenue will it create? How many jobs will it create, here and in China? Were there any other corporate suitors? What, if any, is the advantage of China over the other suitors?
2. Foreign explorers are prospecting in Palawan and other uncontested Philippine territory? Were there any other suitors? What did the cost-benefit analysis reveal, that prompted the choice of one over the other? What is the economic benefit of not bidding out the exploration?
3.What is the economic benefit of not bidding out the NBN contract? What are the specific project costs, that yield the 329 million dollars? We want specific project costs, a la project costs submitted to the DPWH, not just paper napkin calculations.
4. What would be the economic benefit of keeping you at the helm, compared to letting other people rule.
He said the last question is important because if her answer is satisfactory , he can ask his congressmen to support or disapprove Charter Change which Arroyo allies are pushing.
Another blog participant explained his lack of admiration with economists with this anecdote: “There were two economists named Gloria Arroyo and Joey Salceda walking down the street in a barrio. They find some carabao dung. Gloria told Joey, “If you eat that, I will give you P50M.’ Joey picked it up and ate it. Walking further they saw another mound of carabao dung it was Joey’s turn to say, ‘If you eat that, I will give you P50M’ Gloria then picked it up and ate it.
“They continued walking and after some time Joey said, ‘We both ate it, but we are not richer by any amount, we have exactly the same money as before.’ To which Gloria replied, ‘I know. But we have just increased GDP by P100M’”.
So many things we want to ask but all are only blowing with the wind. And her wind is even mightier than the pen.
I wonder what Gloria would response to this questions anyway,
But what did you expect? Long ago she lost the habit of thinking big and moving fast. Since the Garci tape,Her prevailing leadership ideologies have encouraged her to think small, slow and stupid — to forget about regulating, to forget about governing and occupy herself instead with trivia: debates about constitutional amendments on Cha-Cha for instance.
I hope some FOCAP members read Ellenville and ask these excellent questions of Sulbatz and Atty36252 whenever Gloria is ready to face them without conditions.
TT, Chi,
I am more comfortable with your economic fundamentals than the Chief Economist who demands pre-conditions and advance copies of questions to be asked by FOCAP (so she can consult her economic team who can be blamed later if things go sour.)
The presscon of the economic team, convened in haste to cover up the Presidential snub, spoke only economic jargon and did not clarify the economic doom specter. Simple folks like me was not allayed.
GSIS’ Elamparo says dollar investment minimal, meaning 47 billion pesos ($ 1 billion) is picayune. Time to raise the ceiling on plunder.
One way to get Gloria to agree on FOCAP presscon is for Raisa Robles to promise that she will ask questions to titillate gloria’s sex fancies.
The fact that Ate Glue’s economic managers combined and called the panic presscon and did not get their act together gave me the feeling that they have no clue about the effects of the U.S. predicament, how it splatters into Pinoyland, or if there is even a problem. This raised my own level of anxiety. If this administration can’t be of any help, I have devised my own what-ifs.
I expect the global slowdown will negatively affect OFW remittances and consequently, consumer spending, BPO and call center activity. Oil prices may tumble as world demand shrinks, but local inflation will tend to go up, discouraging savings that loses value at 12% or more.
Hi Fenix,
Wala akong binatbat kay Ellenville chief economist Tongue, though I have a little knowledge of what’s going on with the US economy because my earnings depends on faithfully watching CNBC and Bloomberg. heheh!
Ang gaganda nung questions ni Sublatz eh!
Sa isang pikon, di niya kayang harapin ang mga ganoong tanong dahil 2 ang tatamaan nung tanong. Ang pulitika may malaking kinalaman sa pagpapatakbo ng ekonomiya. Kung simpleng tanong lang, dadaanan pa rin niya ang pulitika para masagot ang tanong. Kahit patiwarik pa siyang humarap sa FOCAP ang isang simpleng tanong, magsasanga-sanga.
Yung mga tanong ni Atty ang gaganda rin. Iyon ang mga matitinong tanong. Ang problema yung sasagot sa tanong ay hindi matino. Peke kasi!
Since Gloria likes to brag about her STRONG ECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS….I would have wanted to ask her this question:
1. Under what specific ECONOMIC fundamental that you established, were you able to reduce the eating habits of the Filipinos from three times a day to three times a week?
I taught my dog to eat only twice a day, it worked. Then it became hard to bail the decreasing pellet fund so I taught it to beg for its maintenance once a day early mornings. Its wailing hungry barks served as alarm clock for the neighborhood. Small tots had to go to school, anyways. A friend agreed that canines can remain alive with one feeding like the huskies in the north pole. He experimented with the idea of hybernation to skip feeding for a few days. It worked for a month and water extended the experiment for another week. Perhaps, we can put in more holidays for hybernation to save on food and melamine.
What I’d like to know are :
1. How are they going to lessen the impact of a 12% inflation?
2. Are they going to remove vat in power and fuel?
3. Or are we looking at further taxation?(to improve credit standings)
4. Will they tax Lucio Tan properly this time?
5. Are we opening our natural resources to plunder in the near future?
6. Will the rest of the showbiz personalities do a “Willi Revillame” – pay taxes properly?
7. Will Manny Pacquiao pay taxes properly? The De La Hoya-Pacquiao Fight on December 2008, Manny will earn about $20 million (about 920 million pesos).
8. Nagbabayad ba ang mga Arroyos ng taxes? How about the cabinet members, Senators ang Congressmen?
Cayetano to Villar critics: You have to prove charges
Malacanang to Cayetano: You have to prove charges against FG Mike Arroyo foreign bank account
Diego, I agree it’s high time Manny Pacquiao shows to the public if he has paid his taxes properly. I know that he pays the corresponding taxes in the US properly; but what about in the Philippines? His mentor Chavit Singson said that it’s a win-win for Manny in the coming De La Hoya-Pacquiao fight meaning Manny gets a huge pay even if he loses. How much cut does Singson have? This self-confessed crook’s taxes have never been opened to the public. And when the Provincial Auditor Chan tried to question Singson’s financial status, poor Chan was assassinated. The murder remains unsolved up to this day.
GMA’s presscon? Who cares? I DON’T. Its a WASTE of time. Her tongue is not tainted with Melamine but with tons of BS.
That last part about Gloria, Joey, and the GDP is hilarious. Unfortunately, the joke is on us. Gloria has been feeding us shit. Then she goes and boasts about RP’s GDP growth.
Gloria, the e-CON-omist, gave our motherland nothing but ECONOMIC HOLOCAUST.
Her economic Weapon of Mass Destruction(WMD) is EVAT.
It is not even about press freedom. It is all about a spoiled brat a fake president at that imposing her whim thinking that she can get away with it because she is the president kuno. Well Focap deserved applause for standing up because they already have an idea of what will be her whole story about. It’s all about economics and why would anyone bother attending a press-con when all you are about to hear are her boasting of her success in the economic front with all figures spewing from her mouth are bloated; why bother to listen to when she will claim that she has created a million jobs; why listen to when she will claim that she improved the life of the poor; and why listen about her supposed success in cleaning up and minimizing corruption in her government?
FOCAP knows the real score of the Philippine economy and they need nobody to tell them. Their interest is about the political situation most specifically if she intends and voluntarily steps down come 2010. That’s the question that by all means she wants to avoid because she has other plans.
What’s FOCAP? Federation Of Corrupt Arroyo & Pidal?
Inquirer has picked up the Malacañang-Focap issue:
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20081004-164565/Palace-Focap-at-odds-over-coverage
The story illustrates what I described about majority of the Malacañang Press Corps. Kayang-kaya paikutin ng Malacañang. They allow themselves to be manipulated by Arroyo’s spinners.
The story’s lead was on the submission of questions in advance. That’s not the issue. It’s the restriction on political questions. It’s the screening of questions. That’s prior restraint.
Was it Rizal who said, there are no masters if there are no slaves?
Ate Ellen,
I agree with you that the Inquirer story missed the point. It is PRIOR RESTRAINT pure and simple.
Malacanang has studied its enemy (the Press) very well. It practices SUN TZU’s strategies. Knowing media’s propensity of asking questions that puts Gloria off-balance, Malacanang saw the need to define its own battlefield by setting the rules of the game.
Media on the other hand (FOCAP in this particular situation) refuses to play by the rules set by Malacanang. However, some members of the media team opted (wittingly or unwittingly) to play by Gloria’s rule. That’s where the problem begins because it tends to obfuscate the real issue…..PRIOR RESTRAINT.
I would recommend that media study its enemy (Gloria Dureza) also. It should not limit itself to one option only….i.e., snubbing a press conference. It should balance itself between getting the news it wants and the news Malacanang wants. Being fully aware now that Malacanang wants to introduce a doctrine of “disguised media restraint”, then media should be able to develop also a counter-doctrine for that.
There is a wide range of options available and here are some three of them:
1. Play Malacanang’s game according to its rules.
2. Refuse to play and snub the conference.
3. Play the game according to its rules….BUT LET THE RULES WORK AGAINST THEM.
I would NOT recommend options 1 and 2. However, I could see more advantages in option 3. For example, if Gloria wants to talk only about the ECONOMY, then by all means engage her. Ask her the very questions Atty36252 and myself propounded. If she wants the topic to be about THE ARTS, then ARTS be it!!!! Ask her this question…..Madam President, poverty is on the rise, extra-judicial killings seem to be unchecked, rice can nowhere be found, corruption has become the rule rather than the exception….. Against the backdrop of this grim and bleak SCENERY, how are you able to manage to PAINT A ROSY PICTURE of the situation? She, sure is, a good artist!!!
How about Music? Culture? Religion? There are a lot of questions we can derive from those topics.
A warning though…..Malacanang may opt NOT to answer those questions. Fine! Then media should print those questions. Anyway, these are the very questions the taxpayers and the whole nation would want to ask anyway.
Off topic: O.J. Simpson was convicted of armed robbery. The verdict came after 13 hours of Jury deliberation, 13 years after the murder trial, and on 13 counts of crimes. Is Number 13 really an unlucky number?
One good thing happened as a result of the American economic failures, I am now insured with a US government owned Philam Life Insurance.
Everyone including spiritual leaders are saying the same thing about running in 2010: Bro. Mike Velarde said if God wants him to run, he would. Bro. Eddie Villanueva said he’s waiting for the sign from God. Same line being said by those with the same ambition: GMA, Gov. Panlilio, Vilma Santos…
The question is: Is it okay for religious leaders to be the nation’s leaders? What about the separation of church and state? Where is their loyalty? To the country or the flock?
The Catholic Church argues that poverty is not caused by over population but corruption. If this is so, what has the Catholic Church done in solving the problem of corruption in the country? Aren’t some Bishops as corrupt?