A tense situation transpired 50 nautical miles northwest of Subic Bay in Zambales last Thursday when China seized the underwater drone installed by the United States Navy. Philippine top officials were unconcerned about it.
The Duterte government’s nonchalant attitude towards China’s seizure of the United States’ underwater drone in Philippine territory reflects its hazy understanding of sovereignty.
Sovereignty is the supreme right of the state to command obedience within its territory.
The Philippine territory, as stated in the Constitution, consists “of its terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.”
Two hundred nautical miles from the baselines is the exclusive economic zone of a coastal state.
As stated in the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea or UNCLOS, in the EEZ, the coastal state has sovereign rights on the exploration of the zone including marine scientific research.
Navy Captain Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said the unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) “was lawfully conducting a military survey in the waters of the South China Sea.” the official said.
The drone, reports said, was collecting oceanographic data, including salinity, temperature and clarity of the water.
Reports said USNS Bowditch, an oceanographic survey ship, was recovering the two drones when the Chinese ship approached and took one of the UVV.
On Saturday, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump injected comic relief to an otherwise grave potential conflict when he tweeted: “China steals United States Navy research drone in international waters – rips it out of water and takes it to China in unpresidented act.”
That 21-word tweet exposed the incoming American president’s ignorance of geography (50 nautical miles off Subic Bay is Philippine territory, not international waters) and ineptitude in spelling English words.
The tweet was later re-issued with the correct spelling of “unprecedented.”
Also on Saturday, Pentagon announced that China was returning the drone to them. This was confirmed by the China’s foreign ministry statement that “China decided to return it to the U.S. side in an appropriate manner, and China and the U.S. have all along been in communication about it.”
What has the Philippine government got to say about the China-US conbflict transpired in PH waters?
Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana said until last Thursday’s incident, he didn’t know US drones were operating in the West Philippine Sea. He said he is not concerned about the seizure by China of the U.S drone because, “That is between the US and China.”
Nevertheless, he said they will talk about it in the next security cluster meeting.
Kabayan Partylist Rep. Harry Roque considers it “an invasion of our EEZ” and urged the Philippine government to file diplomatic protests against both the United States and China.
“The United States should not have conducted probes within our EEZ. Similarly, the act of the Chinese submarine in retrieving the said probe is also suspicious. The Philippines maintains its sovereign claim over various features within the West Philippine Sea and it has no interest in allowing its territory to be used as a battleground between the United States and China,” Roque said.
The Duterte government’s lack of concern about the drone incident is consistent with its reaction to reports of China’s installation of military facilities in its occupied islands in the disputed Spratlys in the South China Sea as articulated by Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay, Jr.
“Let them take whatever action is necessary in the pursuit of their national interest… and we will leave it at that, for the Philippines, we have our bilateral engagements with China,” Yasay said.
And what about Philippine national interest?
If the Philippines does not formally protest, China can later claim that the Philippines consented, or at least acquiesced, to China’s military fortifications in the Spratlys, including Mischief Reef. The UNCLOS tribunal had already ruled that Mischief Reef is a submerged area of the continental shelf of the Philippine EEZ and thus only the Philippines can erect structures on Mischief Reef.
When China seized Luconia Shoals from Malaysia in April 2013, Malaysia formally protested but without any publicity. Malaysia did not want China to later claim that Malaysia acquiesced to the seizure for lack of protest.
Malaysia knows how to protect their national interest.
Ay naku, PI talaga si Yasay!
E ano na lang ang nalalaman ni Lorenzana? Ibig sabihin nakalusong na dagat ang mga Intsik at nalusob na ang pinoy wala pa ring alam ang defense chief?!
Hinayang ako sa pinaghirapan nina Justice Carpio na balewala sa mga balless sa Digong administration.
Di ba treason na yan?
Of equal concern is how America can deploy those underwater drones within Philippine territory unless there is some prior arrangement. what we don’t want is for the Philippines to be the battleground again between two rival superpowers. remember world war II, “those who ignore history are condemned to repeat its errors (George Santayana)”.
Agree #2
” The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.”
Territorial waters is specifically defined in the UNCLOS treaty (which the Philippines signed) to extend no more than 12 miles beyond the baseline boundary around a country’s land mass. Beyond this 12 mile limit is another 12 mile zone where the country can exercise hot pursuit or patrol in event of threats or infringements against its territory. The incident happened 50 miles off Subic beyond Philippine territorial waters and what would be considered international waters. That it occurred within the Philippine’s EEZ is of no consequence as the affair was not economic in nature.
Masyado ng develop ang spratly island. Magaling talaga ang China. Kung noon pang panahon ay nilagyan na ng mga structure ang lugar na iyon tiyak hindi aangkinin ng bansang China kasi may mga tao na nakatira. Mga pilipino na rin ang dapat sisihin kung bakit inangkin na ng China ang lugar na iyon.
Noon na panahon o kahit ngayon may mga tao siguro na nagtratrabaho sa sabihin na natin bureau of land. Ang mga lupa na walang titulo o nasilip na wala pang titulo ay ginagawan nila ng titulo at sa kanila na iyon na ang trabaho sa pagtitulo ng lupa. Ganun ang nangyari sa spratly island, napansin ng China na walang nagmamay ari kasi walang tao kaya inangkin nila. Tiyak may titulo na ang China para sa lupain na iyon.
#5 what an amazing highly-technical analysis… thank you..!!
Ilang taon ng masasabing kaalyado ng Amerika ang Pilipinas. Pero sa mga taon na iyon bakit hindi naisip ng Amerika na sa spratly island magtayo ng base militar na kung nakatayo doon walang pag aangkin na mangyayari mula sa China. Kung bakit hindi naisip iyon ng Amerika siguro dahil sa tingin nila walang pakinabang ang isla na iyon kasi malayo sa mga tao at isa pang dahilan walang mga babae na pinay na puwedeng maging asawa. Walang babaeng pinay na bayaran ang puwede magamit. Pero ok din kasi dahil sa kanila na cross breed kung sa manok ang lahi ng mga Pilipino. Dahil sa mga Amerikano na nagkakaanak ng pinay maging dahil man sa club ay nagkaroon ng anak na mestiza o mestizo.
Balik tayo sa spratly island. Ngayon na maayos na at maganda ang spratly island huwag na sanang pakialaman ang China sa ginawa nilang iyon kasi naging walang silbi naman iyon para sa mga namumuno ng bansa o sa mga Pilipino o kahit pa sa Amerika na kung nakapag patayo ng structure o base militar ang Amerika sa lugar na iyon tiyak hindi aangkinin ng China.
#7, did it again boy..!! great knowledge. I like the “manok” theory..! brilliant, brilliant..!
Ang gulo mo a. Ang Spratly Island or Storm Island ay hawak ng Vietnam hindi ng China. Inaangkin din ito ng China at Taiwan pero mga Vietnamese ang nakatigil sa Spratly Island. Tumitira ka rin ba ng Fentanyl? Dapat ka na sigurong ma-tokhang.
LOL!