Skip to content

Gordon to Comelec officials: ‘If you cannot do the job, resign.’

Photo by Feona Imperial, VERA Files
Photo by Feona Imperial, VERA Files

It’s as simple as that.

Former Senator Richard Gordon who is running again for the Senate slammed officials of the Commission on Elections for painting a doomsday scenario if they were to comply with the Supreme Court decision to have the election machines on May 9 issue receipts of the voter’s vote.

He said postponing the May 9 elections is out of the question. “The Comelec is painting a doomsday scenario so that we will be afraid. It will not happen. What they should paint is they can do it. If they do not want to do it, stop giving excuses, leave your job and give it to somebody who can do the job,” said the principal author of the Election Computerization law and one of the petitioners who asked the High Court to compel the election body to follow the law.

In a vote of 14-0, the High Court last Tuesday ordered the Comelec to “enable the vote verification feature of the vote-counting machines which prints the voter’s choices…”

Last Friday, the Comelec filed with the SC, through Solicitor General Florin Hilbay, a motion for reconsideration saying “There is a strong likelihood that the May 2016 elections will fail if the voting receipt feature is enabled by the Comelec at this very late stage of the project.”

Richard Gordon talking to a child lost in a crowd at  the Panabengga Festival in Baguio city.
Richard Gordon talking to a child lost in a crowd at the Panabengga Festival in Baguio city.
Talking with media in Lucena, while on a campaign trail with Partido Galing at Puso led by Presidential Candidate Grace Poe and Vice Presidential Candidate Chiz Escudero, Gordon insinuated that the election officials are up into something not good. He said the election body had six years to do it. “They can still do it. They don’t want to do it because may maitim na balak.”

He said they would rather give in to their “incompetence and laziness.”

He said he can’t buy Comelec’s line that it will further delay the preparation for the May 9 elections as they would have to reconfigure more than 90,000 machines and re-train the hundreds of thousands of Board of Election Inspectors.
He said the reconfiguratioin is just a switch. “You just activate and put it in all the machihes. You can do it in less than a week. I should know. Ako ang gumawa ng batas na yan,” he said.

The SC noted that at the joint congressional oversight committee hearing on Automated Elections last February, Comelec Chairman Andres Bautista gave its reasons for refusing to issue paper receipts. “First, politicians can use the receipts in vote buying… second, it may increase voting time to five to seven hours in election precincts.”

It doesn’t make sense for the election body to sacrifice the integrity and credibility of the election for something that they just fear might happen, which vote is buying. Gordon said it’s “baseless and speculative.”

Gordon said “The law is there. Just implement the law.”

The law (specifically Republic Act No. 8436, Section 6(e), (f), and (n), (e) as amended by Republic Act No. 9369) requires that there should be a Provision for voter verified paper audit trail; System auditability which provides supporting documentation for verifying the correctness of reported election results; Provide the voter a system of verification to find out whether or not the machine has registered his choice.

The danger of excusing Comelec not to follow the law for reasons of their own making is that it will set a precedent and who knows, what more they would ask not to implement next time?

Gordon said if the Comelec officials cannot follow the law, they can be impeached. They can be charged for misfeasance and dereliction of duty.

He, however, said it’s difficult because you would need two-thirds vote of the House of Representatives.

The Supreme Court said: “The credibility of the results of any election depends, to a large extent, on the confidence of each voter that his or her individual choices have actually been counted. It is in that local precinct after the voter casts his or her ballot that this confidence starts. It is there where it will be possible for the voter to believe that his or her participation as sovereign truly counts.”

Published in2016 elections

11 Comments

  1. olan olan

    COMELEC should have NOT remove the machines voting receipt feature (part of the security feature) in the first place! Being COMELEC their mandate is to make sure the tools being use for the election is above board and transparent! Sila pa ang pasimuno. Why would the COMELEC removed this security audit feature? They are being instructed by the Supreme Court to fix this and they should follow instead of delaying it even more. If they don’t, they are in CONTEMPT of court and Congress should exert their effort (i.e. work) to impeach these people and make them accountable!

  2. vic vic

    Instead of Gordon and the SC consulting with the COMELEC if the requirement of issuing the Receipt (which I believe should be outlawed) can be implemented on time for the next election than trying to the outdo each other’s in threats and bluffs as if anyone of them is better than the other and may end up compromising holding an Elections..

    It is my experience that when the Court makes a Ruling against the govt and or its instrumentalities it will give a window of time TO COMPLY and if the time limit can not be complied with Justification can be extended.

    Meaning that working Together, even the independent institutions of the Govt can achieve and do more.. Instead of trying to put each other down.

    Now for example or Reference. Last year the SC ruled that the govt law banning the Physician assisted suicide was unconstitutional, but give the Parliament a year to Craft a guideline for its implementation and it is already expiring and the SC is giving it more Time to Fine Tune its implementing Rule..There are more reference the same as the COMELEC Case but the SC or any lawmaker would not go as far as telling the Body to Quit.
    It is up to the COMELEC executives to quit or they can be Let go by Due Process but ” Just Resign”? … GORDON is getting too Big for his britches.

  3. vic vic

    If a nation can not hold a safe. Honest election without compromising the Sanctity of the Ballot as to its Secrecy ( that is the idea of secret voting and issuing a receipt will defeat all its purpose) than why Bother to have an election at all?

  4. srcitizen2000 srcitizen2000

    sa stand ng comelec, maliwanag na ang mga galamay ni brillantes ay nasa loob pa rin ng organization. sayang ang magandang pagtingin kay andie bautista na nagpapadala sa mga masasamang elemento ng comelec.

  5. Kung halimbawa man ay may receipt sa pag boto ang receipt ba ay sa loob lang ng voting presint may lalagyan o ang receipt ay dadalhin ng tao na bumoto sa paglabas. Kasi kung ang receipt ay dadalhin ng tao na bumoto ay pabor iyon sa mga kandadato na mataas ang pagbigay ng pera para sila iboto kasi ipakita. Please answer…

  6. Kasi kung ang receipt ay dadalhin ng tao na bumoto ay malaki posibilidad na manalo ang mayor na bumibili ng 3 tawsan pesos para iboto. Ganito kasi ang mangyayari halimbawa bigyan muna ang mga botante ng tag 2 tawsan pesos tapos sabihin na ang 1 tawsan ay ibibigay kapag naipakita ang receipt na binoto nga siya. Paano pa kung ang bilihan ng boto ay aabot ng sobra 3 tawsan. Ganun kasi tiyak ang strategy na gawin kung ang receipt ay dadalhin ng tao na bumoto. Kaya ang pakiusap ko ay gusto ko malaman kung ang receipt ay sa loob lang ba ng presinto may lalagyan o dadalhin ng tao na bumoto.

  7. vic vic

    Arvin @ 5 @ 6..Every Ballot printed and issued must be Accounted for…and the best way to do it is to have a set of serial number attached to every Ballot..(a Pair of the same number)..and here how it should be done…just for some idea..or reference.

    Upon issuance of Blank Ballot to the voter, the Returning Officer or Clerk takes the one set of of the Ballot serial number and hand the ballot to the Voter..with one serial number still attached…and before the voter drop the ballot or put in the ballot to machine for counting and tallying as the case maybe, the same returning officer will detached the remaining serial number and compare with the former detached s/n and if they both Matched the ballot is ACCOUNTED and the voter can proceed in inputting the ballot or dropping in the box as the case maybe..if the other pair of the SN did not come home to match, that ballot is not accounted for and MUST BE REPORTED AS MISSING and all ballot that were spoiled or destroyed must also be reported and so all unused ballots..

    It is a crime to “eat” or intentionally destroy a Ballot..and nobody can see or have any authority to access or the names the voter checked on the ballot, nobody…that is why I don’t subscribe to this idea of receipt which will show the names of candidate that the voter checked or voted…it will defeat the sanctity of the secret balloting…and it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

  8. The vote will remain secret if the guidelines will make it secret. A voter’s receipt must be returned to the election officer after the voter has verified and shall be put in the same box where the ballots are kept. I don’t know know how the sanctity of the ballot will be defeated if it is not allowed to be seen by persons other than the voter himself. This process has been done in India for several years. You don’t hear that Indians are complaining about being cheated in the counting – all 1.3 billion of them.

  9. vic vic

    http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ECI_voters_guideline_2006.pd

    Read this guidelines of voting in India and since Indian voters choose only one Candidate among the Candidates to represent the Constituency where they are voting..I did not see or read that receipt of the vote is issued…
    ————————
    Here is the final stage of the voting
    Stage 4: Voting Procedure. • Inside the voting compartment, you are to press the blue candidate button on the Balloting Unit against the name and symbol of the candidate of your choice. • Press the button only once. • On the candidate button being pressed, the red lamp will glow against the name and symbol of that candidate. • There will also be a beep sound heard to indicate that your vote has been recorded and the Busy lamp goes off in the Control Unit. • This process is repeated for other voters till end of the poll.

    10.7 You must remember that secrecy of voting is important. Every elector is expected to maintain the secrecy of voting and in case of failure to maintain secrecy the elector may not be permitted to vote. Any person who violates the secrecy, will be booked for an offence under Section 128 of Representation of People Act, 1951. You should, therefore, not disclose to any person who you have voted for. Similarly, if any election official attempts to obtain information on who you have voted for, it will amount to an offence committed by that official. Photography of a voter casting vote is prohibited. It may also be noted that no polling official or agent can come inside the voting compartment under 7 the pretext of helping you to vote. You can, however, be permitted to take a companion of not less than 18 years with you for recording your vote, if for any physical infirmity you require such assistance.

  10. Read This:

    Voter verified paper audit trail (VVPAT)

    On 8 October 2010 Election Commission appointed an expert technical committee headed by Prof PV Indiresan (former Director of IIT-M) when at an all-party meeting majority of political parties backed the proposal to have a VVPAT in EVMs to counter the charges of tampering. The committee was tasked to examine the possibility of introduction of paper trail so that voters can get a printout that will show symbol of the party to which the vote was cast. After studying the issue, the committee recommended introduction of VVPAT system.

    On 21 June 2011, Election Commission accepted Indiresan committee’s recommendations and decided to conduct field trials of the system. On 26 July 2011, field trial of VVPAT system was conducted at Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir, Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala, Cherrapunjee in Meghalaya, East Delhi in Delhi and Jaisalmer in Rajasthan.

    Just 2 days after Delhi High Court judgement saying EVMs are not “tamper-proof”, Election Commission on 19 January 2012 ordered Electronics Corporation of India Limited and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) to make EVMs that will generate a “paper trail” of the vote cast. BEL CMD Anil Kumar said: “The new EVMs’ paper trail should make the poll process safer and tamper-proof. EC has given us its requirement for EVMs and work is on to incorporate new features. The EVM software will be modified and a printer attached to it. When you cast a vote, the serial number and some data will be generated as a printout. It is to ensure that there is no malpractice in the voting system.” It appears that, when the voter presses the button for the candidate of his choice in the EVM, a paper ballot with the serial number, name and symbol of the candidate will be printed.

Leave a Reply