He had one whole month to tell the Filipino people about his role in the debacle that claimed the lives of 44 members of the Special Action Force of the Philippine National Police, 18 members of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front and six civilians including an eight-year old girl who was hit in the crossfire.
He had three televised address on the armed operation that turned into a massacre – Jan. 28, three days after the tragedy; Jan. 30 necrological service at Camp Bagong Diwa, and Feb. 6 to announce his acceptance of the resignation of suspended Police Chief Alan Purisima.
The people, grieving and angry, wanted an explanation to give sense into the senselessness of brutal deaths of 44 of the country’s elite police officers who were on a mission to arrest two terrorists wanted by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation.
But Aquino’s monologue didn’t enlighten because he instead talked about the assassination of his father in 1983 and the 1989 coup against his mother.
Press Secretary Herminio Coloma said Aquino will decide to reveal what he knows about the police operation at the appropriate time: “Pagpapasyahan po niya ‘yan sa takdang panahon.”
Aquino can take his own sweet time about his version of the truth but the people will know what really happened in Mamasapano in one way or another because borrowing a quote from Chinese writer Lu Xun about the March 1926 massacre in China, “Lies written in ink can never disguise facts written in blood.”
Aquino’s problem with telling the truth about the Mamasapano debacle is because he would be implicating himself.
The line that the administration is trying lead the public to take is that the President was misled by Purisima of the real situation on the ground. They cite the text exchanges between Aquino and his trusted police officer, where the latter was the telling the President at 8:17 in the morning that the military has already sent reinforcement to the SAF: “They are presently in contact with reinforcing elements from BIFF. The containment forces are the ones in contact right now. They are supported by mechanized and artillery support sir.”
But the same text exchanges showed Aquino knew that Oplan Exodus had been operationalized as early as 5:28 in the morning. The text messages also revealed that Aquino was very much involved in the planning of the operation including the physical terrain and the number of personnel involved.
.
Aquino can’t escape accountability for giving Purisima, a suspended government official authority, to be involved in a highly sensitive security operation.
And if Purisima is the culprit,how come Aquino was all praises to him when he accepted the former’s resignation?
The reason why Aquino can’t find the “takdang panahon” to tell the truth was articulated by his sister, Kris Aquino, who said last Sunday, ““Let’s be honest, maraming magiging kaso next year (na isasampa laban sa Presidente.)”
Kris said that in answer to the question by actress Nora Aunor if she will run for an elective position in the 2016 elections. The presidential sister said, anticipating the lawsuits, she has to support her brother.
The Mamasapano tragedy will surely be a factor, in more ways than one, in the 2016 elections.
Aquino will have to make sure that his successor will be an ally or someone who will not do to him what he did to Gloria Arroyo and what Arroyo did to her predecessor, Joseph Estrada.
***
But she got it with her “Do not pervert a nation’s grief” statement issued last Sunday especially her description of the group: “religious and political has-beens.”
She said NTC’s call for people power is a “carefully formulated strategy in the false hope of propagating it legally in the mass media and among supporters without however accruing any criminal liability under the penal laws on rebellion, sedition, and coup d’ etat. This is a false hope, since certain actions already implemented by the group, from organizing foras and conferences of supporters and sympathizers, can already be contemplated as conspiracies relating to sedition, rebellion or coup d’ etat.”
Former Defense Secretary and NSA Adviser Norberto Gonzales had said in a TV interview that there is nothing wrong with people power, or a change in regime through people power which happened in EDSA 1 and 2.
De Lima said:“This is Gonzales’ doublespeak. The NTC has publicly declared in its meetings and so-called consultations that a people power strategy for regime change can only be successful if backed by military support for the installation of the National Transformation Council as a ‘transition government’, and the suspension of elections or any other democratic process sanctioned under a constitutional government, until the enactment of reforms to be dictated by the NTC as the de facto government of the Republic.
“Everything in this strategy is illegal and unconstitutional, except probably for the people power part if executed merely as a form of mass mobilization in the exercise of the people’s freedom of assembly. The installation of the NTC as the governing body of the Republic is nothing but the installation of a civilian-military junta, and the call for the military’s support for its defense and installation is nothing less than a proposal or conspiracy to commit the crime of coup d’etat. The NTC’s pronouncements and publicly declared strategy for the capture of state power through active military support to the NTC are therefore acts which already constitute conspiracy or proposal to commit rebellion and coup d’ etat (Art. 136 in relation to Arts. 134 and 134-A, Revised Penal Code), conspiracy to commit sedition (Art. 141 in relation to Art. 139, RPC) or, at the very least, inciting to sedition (Art. 142, RPC), as well as illegal assemblies (Art. 146, RPC).
“A junta by any other sanitized name is still illegal and unconstitutional. By calling for people power and military support to force the President’s ‘resignation’ in order to pave the way for a junta, the NTC and its mushrooming allied alphabet soup organizations of discredited government officials consisting of charged plunderers, grafters, and tax evaders, or of those under investigation for such crimes, may have just crossed the line of legitimate dissent. The government will not relent in applying the full force of the law against them in order to protect the people and the State from an unconstitutional and illegal power grab.
“In the end, any civilian or religious-led putsch will not succeed, because the military will never support the extra-constitutional installation of a junta led by GMA bishops and ex-officials. The AFP and the PNP stand behind the President, no matter how the Mamasapano incident is exploited by opportunists, such as NTC, to sow discord and division among their ranks. It is the height of pathetic gutter politics, when the tragic loss of 44 police officers killed in the line of duty is used by disgraced pathological personalities to crawl their way back to national relevance, at the expense of the people’s effort to come to terms with the complex issue of peace in Mindanao in their search for justice for the SAF44. The nation is still grieving, and without any sense of shame, these personalities would use the people’s grief to pervert a national catharsis, serving only their own thirst and craving for absolute power by imposing upon this nation a tyranny of religious and political has-beens.”
Sana nga.
But based on the expected effect of the sabah standoff on the 2013 midterm polls, I am not hopeful.
I’m not sure I understand the factual basis for the conclusions that Mr. Aquino does not speak the truth. The entire Senate on Day 4 of the public hearings heard the testimony absolving the President of complicity, and grasped for the first time that he was actually responsibly involved, and misled on two occasions. Even opposition senators accept this. But the rabid anti-aquino people continue to adjust the facts to fit their prior commitment, to undermine the President of their nation at every opportunity.
As I was watching yesterday’s Senate hearing, what struck me is
1. Accordingly, the military already declared ceasefire, yet the milf kept on firing at the SAF for hours
2. Why are they having a training….and mind you with those terrorist group
3. Why is it that Purisima is on top of the situation, while he is on suspension
4. The President already knew of the situation
5.It seems that the chief negotiator acting so weird and Sec deles answering for ferrer.
There are so many things to ask, yet nobody can answer rightly.
Another glaring mistake of ferrer is when she answered that it is due to politics because of next year’s election, political alignment, etc…etc (something like that)
What does she want, does she want to accept an award of national significance. I met ferrer, when I was still in Malaysia and she has very high regards for herself.
In the case of milf, why are we still negotiating with an organization who is demanding too much as if the government is negotiating with another “state”. How can the government negotiate with a very treacherous organization, who was previously branded as “terrorist organization”.
And in the case of the President, the blaming game continues, of course, Purisima, for that matter will not act on his own without the blessing of the higher up. What if the operation was successful??? will that exonerate Purisima???
SA SALITANG TAGALOG…. “NAPASO ANG OPERASYON”
The name of the game of this administration is……its your fault not mine…
Has anybody asked Binay, Roxas on what should be done about mamasapano?
these are the 2 frontrunners for the presidency, hindi ba? have they taken the duterte approach? or are they calling for justice for the slain SAFs? has binay split with the administration on the way they handled mampasano aftermath and what should be done with the MILF?
napansin ko si cayetano talagang gigil na gigil vs MILF. is he positioning himself as the presidential candidate who will fight for SAF’s justice?
Aquino’s friends continue to put him in trouble.
We will be more patriotic and pro-Filipino if we wait for the final investigation report. We are not doing our country any good by being too fast in making half-baked conclusions and accusations. Bakit pa magsasagawa ng opisyal na imbestigasyon kung alam niyo na pala ang buong katotohanan?
As to the 2016 elections, yes the Mamamasapano incident will be a big factor in much the same degree that corruption and venality will be.
jcj2013, your voice of reason is sooooo refreshing.
Yes #6! So much gastos and waste of effort for the hearings all the while ‘everyone’ knows the truth pala based on their own leanings, mindsets and ‘constructed’ facts.
The 2016 elections will be challenging for the voters, I pray majority have already matured.
I very much doubt that this tragedy will be an issue to be reckoned with come elections 2016. Even if the opposition brings this out, it won’t matter much.
Seems the Secretary loves to quote section numbers of the law without reading their text carefully. She seems to have read recent history incorrectly as well.
Coup de etat is committed by:
Note that the law says “swift attack accompanied by violence.”
How is rebellion committed?
Note it says taking arms. By arms is meant weapons, not Kapit-bisig.
How did the military support people power in EDSA 1, 2, and 3? By withdrawing support from the government. It did not attack the government. It just sided with the people, implying that they would disobey the government if the government ordered the army to disperse the people (usually, violently, with teargas, truncheons, etc.).
So there is no “swift attack”,nor the “taking of arms” against the government, in any people power support by the military. There is, in fact, a withdrawal of arms (from the government), and a resolve not to use those arms against the people.
An essential element, therefore, of rebellion and coup d’etat is missing, if the military supports any people power.
Tell the bi7ch to go back to law school.
If she were reciting before the late Haydee Yorac, the Professor would have asked? Are you a Congresswoman? So why did you amend the law? What you just recited is different from the text of the law.
^ There was military support for Edsa 3? Non-support would be more like it.
#9,Lurker, Please read the article well.Read the title closely. I said “factor”, not necessarily a campaign issue.
This is the core of the article:
“Aquino will have to make sure that his successor will be an ally or someone who will not do to him what he did to Gloria Arroyo and what Arroyo did to her predecessor, Joseph Estrada.”
That is the “factor.”
^ Ang tanong diyan ay mayroon nga bang gagawa ng ganoon sa kanya, kahit pa klaro sa kanilang puso’t isipan ang samu’t saring nagawang pagtataksil sa madilim na yugtong ito?
Tiyak kong alam din nilang hindi lang si AbNoy o sampu ng kanyang Dilawang Pangkat ang makakalaban nila kung nagkataon.
Kaya nga, di ba, whitewash to the max na ang ginagawa nila?
# 8. chi, protection of their kind ang alam nilang laro.
alam na natin ang mangyayari sa walang kuwentang imbestigasyon sa brutal at karumaldumal na bahaging ito ng kasaysayan ng aquino administration – MABABAON DIN SA LIMOT!
karamihan naman sa mga nagiging pangulo ng bansa ay kapakanan ng mga mamamayan ang unang priority SUBALIT kapag nakapuwesto na ay napapangibabawan ng nepotismo at pagkiling sa mga taga-suportang naghatid sa kanila sa kapangyarihan AT ang nagiging bunga ay ang pagkakaroon ng hindi patas na pagpapairal ng pamamahala. kumbaga, iba ang tinititigan at iba ang tinitingnan.