Skip to content

Who will PNoy send to Beijing?

There are two positive things that resulted in the ongoing standoff in the Scarborough Shoal.
One is the decision of President Aquino recall the appointment of family friend Domingo Lee as ambassador to China and two, the raising of the conflicting territorial claims to the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea has been accelerated.

With the withdrawal of Lee’s appointment, the next question is, who will Aquino send to fill the long-vacant post in Beijing?

Three names have been mentioned.

Basilio
The first one is recently-retired Erlinda Basilio. A career foreign service officer, Basilio’s last position was foreign affairs undersecretary for policy under the Aquino administration, a position that she also held under the Arroyo administration. Briefly, while waiting for now Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario to assume the position, she served as acting foreign secretary.

Basilio’s calm demeanor masks a certain toughness that is needed in dealing with a bully like China. Basilio is a veteran in diplomatic pressures. She is not easily intimidated.

Cruz
Another name mentioned is Luis T. Cruz, who is now our ambassador to South Korea.

Also a career officer,Cruz served as consul general in the Philippine Consulate General in Guangzhou, which he opened in 1997.

Cruz has the gift of “speaking his truth quietly and clearly” which is important in dealing with a pugnacious adversary.

Another name being floated is Chito Sta. Romana, former American Broadcasting Company news bureau in Beijing. He has retired from ABC and is now based in the Philippines.

Sta. Romana’s Philippine-China background is colorful. He was one of the student activists who were visiting China when President Ferdinand Marcos suspended the writ of habeas corpus in 1971 (declared martial law on Sept. 21, 1972). His twin brother in the Philippines was arrested.

Sta. Romana
Sta. Romana, who speaks Mandarin, was one of the five (of the 15 students) who stayed in China. They experienced the Mao Tse Tung’s harsh Cultural Revolution as well as the opening of China to the world.

He spent 39 years of his adult life in China and he has been quoted in a newspaper article as saying, ““I understand China more than the Philippines.”

Sta. Romana was one of those tapped by Philip Juico, husband of Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Chair Margie Juico, to brief Domingo Lee about China.

Now, if Aquino wants to rattle the bullying China, he may want to send someone who is perceived to be close to Washington DC, former foreign secretary Roberto R. Romulo, son of the late Carlos P. Romulo.

***
Not surprising that China, ignored the invitation of the Philippines to bring the issue of conflicting claims over Scarborough Shoal, 124 nautical miles from Zambales, to the United Nations International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.

China has opted out of the arbitration mechanism when it signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Last year when Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario proposed going to ITLOS to resolve the conflicting territorial claims in the South China Sea, the foreign ministry spokesman said, “China always maintains that the South China Sea dispute should be resolved through direct negotiations between directly concerned countries.”

China knows that their so-called historical claims as shown in its nine-dashed line map has no legal basis in international law.

The Philippines has long wanted to bring the issue to ITLOS, the only arena where it has an even chance with the military and economic giant. But it wanted to go through the diplomatic process of bringing it first to the Association of South East Asian Nations.

Last November, in the meeting of ASEAN plus three Asian countries (China, Japan, South Korea) in Bali, Del Rosario proposed the Zone of Peace, Freedom, Friendship and Cooperation in West Philippine Sea or South China Sea.

The basic principle of ZOPFFC is, there is a need to segregate the disputed area from the non-disputes area. “what is ours is ours, and what is disputed can be shared,” he said.

Asean was cool to the proposal which was understandable because of China’s strong influence on member countries through trade and investments.

The Philippines tried again to include in ZOPFFC in the Asean summit in Pnom Penh early this month but host Cambodia refused to include it in the discussion.

Other Asean countries also snubbed Philippine offer to host a meeting on the discussion of the Code of Conduct in the South China between Asean and China.

After having exhausted the Asean process, it’s now time to bring the issue to the UN, with or without China.

Published inForeign AffairsSouth China Sea

20 Comments

  1. Aurore de Breizh Aurore de Breizh

    The better choice in my view is the professional and seasoned diplomat Cruz.

  2. Aurore de Breizh Aurore de Breizh

    We must for the sake of peace — yes, FOR the sake of peace, MODERNISE OUR NAVY AND OUR AIR FORCE… We cannot physically establish ownership of our shoals found within a few miles of our shore (part and parcel of the Philippine regime of islands) without the means to occupy and to guard them. This is in no way a declaration of intent to engage China in a shooting war but for goodness sake it is common sense that your home has less risk of being broken into and looted when they know it is inhabited. The same common sense applies to the shoals no matter how some detractors think that China is Lord and Master to all or that it’s useless to even try to do something…

  3. Aurore de Breizh Aurore de Breizh

    We MUST PHYSICALLY OCCUPY our shoals or at the very least relentlessly patrol them (if the shoals are inhospitable)…

  4. Aurore de Breizh Aurore de Breizh

    China will be hard put to jerk military occupants from our shoals and islets and throw them into the sea even if they have the military means far superior than ours — politically, it will be international suicide to do something of the kind and the Chinese, bullies as they may seem to us, will care about international backlash!!!

  5. parasabayan parasabayan

    A Chinese speaking one would help.

  6. parasabayan parasabayan

    Agree Anna. China has to protect her image worldwide. If the other countries using Chinese products will decide to stop ordering their products because these countries perceive China as a bully, China will lose business.

  7. parasabayan parasabayan

    Sabi nga ni Tongue, maglagay lang ng malaking billboard doon with “BAWAL UMIHI DITO”.

  8. Rudolfo Rudolfo

    If possible, President Pnoy creates a Commission of Ambassador to China headed by the 3-mentioned names..Sta Romana be the Chief, Basilio and Cruz be the members ( or either of them as chief..)..Because of the call of the situation or time, the country badly needs their wide knowledge about foreign policy, specially the china’s cultures, language, policies and all other aspects of mutual respect and understanding of both country, Philippines and China. Its not a time yet of a military intervention or blood letting, human values is still higher than chaos or war…..just my food for thought.

  9. olan olan

    parasabayan – April 20, 2012 1:25 am

    Sabi nga ni Tongue, maglagay lang ng malaking billboard doon with “BAWAL UMIHI DITO”.

    Mali spelling..dapat “Bawal umehi dito” 🙂

  10. dan1067 dan1067

    Who will PNoy send to Beijing?
    Henry Sy, Lucio Tan & John Gokongwei

  11. saxnviolins saxnviolins

    Manahimik muna sana yung LVN productions (Lacierda, Valte, Noy).

    We cannot try this case by publicity, like Corona’s.

    The Chinese are very particular about saving face or losing face. So when we trumpet before media that they have no legal claim, or that their claim of historical right is empty, they cannot help but fire back, in order not to lose face. Similarly, any action, whether negotiation, or talks, should take the concept of “face” into account.

    Yang mga putak-putak sa media, nakakahadlang lang sa resolution of the case.

    Isa lang ang mungkahi ko. In the words of Nike, just do it. Maghabla sa international court. Huwag masyadong nahahayok sa microphone. Diplomatic matters ito, hindi karaoke; they are best conducted in private.

    Yan ang problema sa youtube and reality-TV generation. Bawat kibot, gustong i-televise, at ilathala.

  12. xman xman

    Mas mabuti siguro na pansamantalang gawing special envoy sa China si Ramos habang naghahanap ng ambassador para sa China.

  13. parasabayan parasabayan

    Tama Sax. Lalo lang lalala ang situwasyon kung dakdak ng dakdak. Matters like these should be done through diplomatic channels as well as international courts able to resolve issues like these.

  14. Up to now, I’m still waiting for the actual filing with the UN the issue on this conflicting territorial claims with China.

    Walk the talk.

  15. saxnviolins saxnviolins

    Kaya pala hindi makademanda; China has not accepted the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea. Although they agreed to the treaty, mayroon pa silang citizen who sits in the Tribunal, they do not accept the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

    http://www.un.org/Depts/los/settlement_of_disputes/choice_procedure.htm

    The link refers to Article 298, which is found below:

    http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm

    Article 298 includes “historic titles” yung legal basis kuno, ng China.

    How have they agreed to resolve disputes? By conciliation, under the procedure found below:

    http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/annex5.htm

    Note, hindi binding yung report of the conciliators. Any party may accept or reject the report. The report only suggest measures for negotiation to be undertaken by the parties in dispute.

    Anong bottom line, negotiations. China knows with its size, it has the upper-hand in any negotiations. By mere recalcitrance, it can get concessions. So from nothing (no legal right), they get something. Kung umareglo lahat, Philippines, Vietnam, etc, makakasawsaw sa economic benefits ang China sa dagat na napakalayo sa kanila.

    What to do? Go ahead and file a notice for compulsory conciliation. Kahit walang mangyari, it will calm the waters.

    That is better than China’s gunboat diplomacy, or the Philippines’ broadcast (dakdak) diplomacy.

    And for God’s sake, tumahimik muna yang Raul Hernandez na yan. Isama niyo na yang LVN productions.

  16. saxnviolins saxnviolins

    Awaiting moderation daw. Let us try this without the www’s

    Kaya pala hindi makademanda; China has not accepted the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea. Although they agreed to the treaty, mayroon pa silang citizen who sits in the Tribunal, they do not accept the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

    un.org/Depts/los/settlement_of_disputes/choice_procedure.htm

    The link refers to Article 298, which is found below:

    un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm

    Article 298 includes “historic titles” yung legal basis kuno, ng China.

    How have they agreed to resolve disputes? By conciliation, under the procedure found below:

    un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/annex5.htm

    Note, hindi binding yung report of the conciliators. Any party may accept or reject the report. The report only suggest measures for negotiation to be undertaken by the parties in dispute.

    Anong bottom line, negotiations. China knows with its size, it has the upper-hand in any negotiations. By mere recalcitrance, it can get concessions. So from nothing (no legal right), they get something. Kung umareglo lahat, Philippines, Vietnam, etc, makakasawsaw sa economic benefits ang China sa dagat na napakalayo sa kanila.

    What to do? Go ahead and file a notice for compulsory conciliation. Kahit walang mangyari, it will calm the waters.

    That is better than China’s gunboat diplomacy, or the Philippines’ broadcast (dakdak) diplomacy.

    And for God’s sake, tumahimik muna yang Raul Hernandez na yan. Isama niyo na yang LVN productions.

  17. Correct, SnV. That’s what legal experts have been telling DFA.

    Del Rosario is into that line. But I don’t know what’s keeping them from doing it. It should have been done a long time ago.

    I have been asking the DFA people the past days, why is it all press release about bringing the issue to the UN. Their answer was: we are going there.

    I’m still waiting with bated breath.

  18. From a former foreign affairs officer:

    “It is important that PNOY leaves it up to del Rosario to make the selection. We cannot afford ‘on the job’ training. The ambassador must already be well trained before going to Beijing. In sum, a career officer.”

  19. saxnviolins saxnviolins

    The irony of it all.

    Umaareglo sa MILF; letting a small band dictate their terms; at the same time, trading barbs against China.

    This President is hilarious.

Leave a Reply